Fuel ‘too dirty’ for Europe sold to Africa

Swiss firms have been criticised in a report for their links to the African trade in diesel with toxin levels that are illegal in Europe.

Campaign group Public Eye says retailers are exploiting weak regulatory standards.

Vitol, Trafigura, Addax & Oryx and Lynx Energy have been named because they are shareholders of the fuel retailers.

Trafigura and Vitol say the report is misconceived and retailers work within legal limits enforced in the countries.

Three of the distribution companies mentioned in the report have responded by saying that they meet the regulatory requirements of the market and have no vested interest in keeping sulphur levels higher than they need to be.

Although this is within the limits set by national governments, the sulphur contained in the fumes from the diesel fuel could increase respiratory illnesses like asthma and bronchitis in affected countries, health experts say.

While the picture is changing, there are several African countries which still allow diesel to have a sulphur content of more than 2,000 parts per million (ppm), with some allowing more than 5,000ppm, whereas the European standard is less than 10ppm.

East African countries of Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda and Burundi are the least affected as it was found that sulpher content in diesel sold in the region is just 50ppm.

However, Somalia is among those that allow diesel with more than 5,000ppm to be sold in their jurisdiction. It is the same case with Egypt, Tunisia and Congo Brazzaville.

Rob de Jong from the UN Environment Programme (Unep) told the BBC that there was a lack of awareness among some policy makers about the significance of the sulphur content.

For a long time countries relied on colonial-era standards, which have only been revised in recent years.

Another issue is that in the countries where there are refineries, these are unable, for technical reasons, to reduce the sulphur levels to the standard acceptable in Europe. This means that the regulatory standard is kept at the level that the refineries can operate at.

Some governments are also worried that cleaner diesel would be more expensive, therefore pushing up the price of transport.

But Mr De Jong argued that the difference was minimal and oil price fluctuations were much more significant in determining the diesel price.

The sulphur particles emitted by a diesel engine are considered to be a major contributor to air pollution, which the World Health Organization (WHO) ranks as one of the top global health risks.

It is associated with heart disease, lung cancer and respiratory problems.

The WHO says that pollution is particularly bad in low and middle income countries.

Reducing the sulphur content in diesel would go some way to reducing the risk that air pollution poses.

Unep is at the forefront of trying to persuade governments to tighten up the sulphur content regulations and is gradually making progress.

In 2015, the East African Community introduced new regulations for Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi and Tanzania. Diesel cannot now have more than 50ppm in those countries.

It is clear that the situation has improved since 2005 when it was at 5000ppm and above in Kenya.

Previous Kenya refugee repatriation ‘unlawful’, claims Human Rights Watch
Next Kenya slams HRW report on Dadaab refugees

You might also like

Latest 0 Comments

Change the election date, Githu tells MPs

Attorney General Githu Muigai has proposed to Parliament to consider an amendment to IEBC Act of 2009, and to among other things change the date of the 2017 elections. While appearing

Latest 0 Comments

Trump: Obama is a ‘very good man’

US President Barack Obama (R) listens to President-elect Donald Trump (L) deliver remarks to members of the news media during their meeting in the Oval Office of the White House

Latest 0 Comments

Countries sign UN roadmap for elimination of harmful fishing subsidies

Over 90 countries have signed a roadmap agreement seeking to end harmful fishing subsidies. The agreement follows a survey, which showed that fishing subsidies are estimated to be as high

0 Comments

No Comments Yet!

You can be first to comment this post!

Leave a Reply